June, 2003
Contact: Sarah Ray
802-443-5794
sray@middlebury.edu
Posted: June 4, 2003
MIDDLEBURY,
Vt.—The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources has selected Middlebury
College to receive a 2002 Vermont Governor’s Award for Environmental
Excellence and Pollution Prevention. Middlebury, which won its award in
the category of Environmental Excellence in Resource Conservation, will
receive the award for the deconstruction and recycling of its former science
center. According to agency officials, the transition of gubernatorial
administrations necessitated recognition of the recipients of the 2002
awards in 2003.
In a letter to Nan Jenks-Jay, Middlebury College
director of environmental affairs, Elizabeth “Wibs” McLain,
secretary of the agency, stated, “Your award-winning project stands
out as a model that should inspire all Vermonters to find innovative approaches
to conserve natural resources and to prevent pollution before it is generated.”
Tom McGinn, project manager in the College’s
facilities planning office, attended a ceremony in the House Chamber of
the Vermont State House on May 29, and accepted the award on behalf of
Middlebury from McLain and Governor Jim Douglas.
Opened in 1968, the College’s old science
center was in use through the spring of 1999. Bicentennial Hall, a new
science center on the western edge of campus, opened in the fall of that
year.
In 2001, several teams of consultants determined
that the old science building was not a candidate for renovation or reuse.
Once the science center’s site was identified as the location for
the new library, college officials decided that, rather than haul the
rubble to the landfill, they would recycle what ended up being more than
97 percent of the entire six-story building.
Recycling the facility was consistent with the College’s
own waste management standards. Middlebury’s trustees had endorsed
sustainable design and building principles for the College in 1999. In
addition to these guidelines, a construction and demolition waste policy
was adopted in 2000. “The removal of the old science center truly
put these self-imposed regulations to the test,” said Jenks-Jay.
The College tracked the weights and destination
of all material that came from the building in order to fully document
the actual volume and reuse of materials in the deconstruction process.
“With deconstruction, a much higher percentage of the structure
can be recycled compared to the traditional demolition process, in which
only 25 percent or less can be salvaged. It was quite fascinating to watch
a structure being taken apart with the same care and level of skill that
was used when it was assembled,” added Jenks-Jay.
The building contained large amounts of material
for recycling, including more than 650 tons of concrete and glass, 178
tons of light mixed iron and 48 tons of wood. The majority of the building
consisted of concrete. Workers loaded the concrete chunks piece by piece
into a “crusher” which was located on-site. The material was
used as project fill for the new library and other campus construction
sites as well as roads. Portions of the exterior walls made up largely
of limestone were salvaged for reuse. Another portion of the building
consisted of recyclable metals such as copper, steel and aluminum. The
remaining debris included wood, which was turned into chips and then sent
to a wood-burning electricity plant.
According to McGinn, while deconstruction required
more labor and time, estimates for a straight imploding and demolition
of the old science center proved equally expensive, particularly given
the high fees charged by local landfills.