Classroom Research Activities and IRB Approval: Guidance for Faculty
There are many contexts where students engage in class-based activities that would be considered human subjects research under the purview of the IRB when they occur outside the classroom context (i.e. conducting interviews or surveys, conducting replications of benign cognitive psychology experiments, etc.). Sometimes the enrolled students are the participants contributing data, and sometimes they are the researchers collecting the data. To determine whether IRB involvement is needed, the key question is: what is the intended purpose of the activity/data? If the intent is to potentially contribute to generalizable knowledge via presentation or publication outside of the classroom context, then IRB involvement will be required. If the intent is solely to educate the student on how to conduct research or for the faculty member to improve their own teaching practices, then IRB will generally not be involved.
Below are six examples to help clarify this. There may be exceptions, of course. If the activity you have planned for your class does not neatly fit in any of these categories, please reach out to the IRB to discuss.
While some classroom-based research activities may not meet the requirements for IRB oversight, the Middlebury IRB recognizes the importance of protecting the persons who support student learning by participating in these research activities. The IRB provides the following guidance to assist faculty in balancing rigorous pedagogy with the need to protect human participants: Guidance and Best Practices for Classroom-Based Research Activities.
When the students are participants/subjects in the research activity:
Scenario 1: A research activity where the faculty member is collecting data from their students to address a research question AND the intent is to publish/share the data outside the classroom context
- Because the intent is to publish/share the data, we consider this intent to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
- IRB application is required
- May meet the criteria for Exemption 1, Normal Educational Practices – but IRB application and approval are still needed before research can begin
- Faculty must have CITI training up-to-date
Example: faculty member wants to study whether frequent quizzing improves scores on the unit exam. Gives quizzes in unit 1 and not in unit 2 and compares scores. Plans to submit the project to a teaching conference or share at a college teaching & learning symposium.
Scenario 2: A research activity where the faculty member is collecting data from their students to determine best practices for their own teaching improvement. No plans to publish or share the data.
- Because the intent is to improve their own teaching, this is not considered contributing to generalizable knowledge.
- No IRB involvement needed
- Faculty should use care to conduct this work ethically, but no CITI training or IRB involvement is needed.
Example: Same example as above, but faculty will keep the results only for their own purposes and teaching improvement.
Scenario 3: A research activity where the faculty member is collecting data from their students to generate a dataset for the class to learn how to analyze data. The data will not be shared outside the classroom.
- Because the intent is to generate data for educational purposes and the data will not be shared, the IRB does not consider this intent to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
- No IRB involvement needed.
- Faculty should use care to conduct this ethically. Be considerate about asking sensitive questions and provide opportunities for students to opt-out of providing their data. See the IRB recommendations for best practices linked above.
Example: Faculty member gives students a survey in class and provides the resulting data for them to analyze to learn about statistical procedures.
When the students are the researchers or research assistants in the research activity:
Scenario 4: A research activity where the students are all collecting data from human participants for the same research question AND the intent is to have the option share the results outside of the classroom context (present results at a department or college symposium, submit for publication or presentation).
- Because the intent is to share the data beyond the classroom context, we consider this intent to contribute to generalizable knowledge
- One IRB application is required
- Faculty member and all students must complete CITI training and be listed on the IRB protocol as study personnel
Example: In a political science class, students all collect data from 20 participants on attitudes toward voting. The data is compiled and analyzed. If the results are significant, the faculty member will consider writing it up for publication or presentation.
Scenario 5: A research activity where students are collecting data from human participants in small groups or individually AND the intent is to have the option to share the results outside of the classroom context (present results at a department or college symposium, submit for publication or presentation).
- Because the intent is to share the data beyond the classroom context, we consider this intent to contribute to generalizable knowledge
- Separate IRB applications are required for each student, with the faculty member serving as faculty PI for each
- Faculty member and all students must complete CITI training and be listed on their IRB protocols as study personnel
Example: Students in a research methods course each create a survey designed to answer a research question. At the end of the semester, the results are shared at a departmental poster session.
Scenario 6: Research activity where students are collecting data from human participants, either for the same research question or in small groups for different research questions BUT the data will never leave the classroom context. The intent of the work is to educate students on how to conduct research and analyze data, and there is no intent to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
- Because there is no intent to share beyond the classroom context, there is no intent to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
- No IRB involvement needed
- Faculty member is responsible for ensuring that students are adequately trained in ethical conduct of research with human participants. Principles of beneficence, respect for persons, and justice should be applied. Faculty member may opt to have students complete CITI training or provide their own training. See the IRB recommendations for best practices linked above.
Example: Students each design a set of interview questions related to the topics of the course and conduct interviews with participants to learn qualitative research techniques. Students each submit a final paper and analysis at the end of the term, but the data are not shared beyond the classroom context.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q What if my intent to publish/share the data changes? Can I receive IRB approval after the data has been collected?
No. IRB approval cannot be granted retroactively. This means that if there is any chance that you or your student(s) will want to be able to use the data outside of the classroom context in the future, you should seek IRB approval ahead of time. If you are a faculty member overseeing multiple student projects as part of a course and some want to be able to present their work outside the classroom in the future, but others do not, it is OK for only those students who wish to present their work outside the classroom to submit IRB applications.
Q Can I just get a blanket IRB approval for my whole course?
The scenarios on this page may clarify this. IRB approvals are granted for specific projects, not courses. If your course involves students all collecting data using the same or highly similar methods around a single research question, then you may be able to submit a single IRB application. However, if the projects have different methodologies or research questions, each one will need its own IRB application.
Q Do I need to submit anything if I am doing a class project that will stay within the classroom?
No. If you are confident that your class project does not require IRB involvement, based on the descriptions on this page, you do not need to submit anything to the IRB. If you are unsure, you should reach out to the IRB to check. Collecting data that should be under IRB purview without IRB approval is noncompliance and will handled be per the Middlebury IRB noncompliance policy.
Q How long does it take to get IRB approval for projects that are taking place as part of a course?
The same timelines that apply to all IRB applications apply to projects that are part of a course. This means that protocols that are reviewed via the Exempt or Expedited process will generally have a 1-2 week turnaround time. Projects that require Full Board review must be discussed at a monthly IRB meeting, approval will generally be finalized 1-2 weeks after the project is discussed. We do not recommend attempting to conduct a project that will require full-board review from start to finish within a single semester. If you wish to conduct a project requiring Full Board review with students as part of a course, please consult with IRB staff well in advance so that we can assist in planning and advise about what is feasible.